APPROVED with modifications 07/31/2018
CB2 hearing: 05/21/2018
LPC hearing: 06/12/2018 – No Action
LPC meeting: 07/31/2018
Gansevoort Market Historic District
Between Washington Street and Greenwich Street
Image courtesy of Google Street View
—- APPLICATION INFORMATION —-
1) From the CB2 agenda: Application is to extend and restore existing 3-story building to 6 stories, with the new portion setback 20’-0” from the existing street façade.
3) View CB2 Resolution: Available in PDF.
4) View the video: A curated list of LPC videos of these presentations from March 2014 onward can be found on our YouTube page. Click HERE to view the video from 06/12/2018 and HERE to view the video from 07/31/2018. Please note that the LPC posts these videos about a week after the presentation. Videos include the applicant’s presentation, public testimony (for hearings only), and deliberation by the LPC commissioners.
5) LPC designation report: Read this property’s architectural/historical description.
6) Receive updates by email: Please click here if you would like GVSHP to email you when there are updates to the status of this application.
—- STATUS OF THIS APPLICATION —-
This section provides updates if there are changes to the hearing dates listed above, which includes instances when an application has been laid over (aka postponed). If applicable, LPC public meeting dates for this application will also be tracked here. Please note that public testimony is taken at public hearings, but not at public meetings.
Please note: All LPC public hearings and public meetings are held at the Municipal Building, 1 Centre Street, 9th floor north, public hearing room (unless otherwise noted).
STAY UPDATED! Click here for our e-alerts to be updated on this application as soon as we find out more.
07/31/2018: At today’s LPC public meeting, this application was approved with the modification that the signage at the marquee be eliminated.
06/21/2018: At today’s public hearing, the applicant was asked to make revisions to the proposal and present the revised proposal at a future public meeting. The comments from the Commissioners varied and there was debate about if the mass was appropriate. Additionally, some of the commissioners felt that the design of the addition did not relate well to the existing building.